Presenting Innovation in a Way That Gets to ‘Yes’

In the innovation field, the closest thing we have to a professional association is the InnovationNetwork and its annual Convergence conference (produced in partnership with the Institute for International Research), which just took place in Minneapolis. I’m on a plane heading home to California as I write this, and I have to say, this was the best conference I’ve attended in quite some time.

The talk in the hallways was about the up-tick in the number of companies launching innovation makeovers. Just as some of us predicted, as the global economy has improved and CEOs get past their hunker down/cut costs/survival mentality, the question of how to drive growth begins to dog them. But getting senior management to take action on innovation often needs a catalyst.

To address this issue at Convergence, I led a CEO/Senior Management Panel titled “How to Present Innovation in a Way That Gets to Yes”. We jettisoned the traditional panel discussion draped table and moderator podium and replaced it with a more dynamic talk show format. It went well, and was very well received. Guests on the lighthearted program included Carol Pletcher, Cargill Innovation Officer; Stephen N. Oesterle, M.D., Senior Vice President Medicine and Technology, Medtronic, Inc; Virginia Albanese, Vice President of Service, FedEx Custom Critical; and Alex Cirillo, head of 3M Commercial Graphics.

Championing innovation as a driver of growth

In my opening monologue, I noted that each time another company says yes to innovation, you can be sure there was a champion at work behind that decision. And quite often a team of committed people as well. They did their homework. Amassed the evidence. And made the case for embarking on a new approach to innovation as a way to drive growth.

With PriceWaterhouseCoopers and Accenture surveys showing that innovation has risen to the top of CEO priorities, you might think this would be easy. It isn’t. CEOs know there is a great need to master innovation. But there’s a lot of trepidation.

Top-line vs. bottom-line growth

As a result, companies have long favored interventions and initiatives that promise immediate returns: lean manufacturing, TQM, reengineering, Six Sigma and scores of others. These process improvements, none of which are easy to implement, have the benefit of showing short-term cost-savings, and elimination of inefficiency, the need for fewer staffers. They are, therefore, easier for consultants from outside and/or advocates on the inside to sell to the guys in the head shed. But here’s what is not often clear: they do nothing to create top-line growth. They only improve the bottom line, and after awhile you run out of places to cut.

Oh sure, you can achieve growth from mergers and acquisitions, thus the M&A boom of the1990s. Guess who did a phenomenal job of selling CEOs on that strategy? Banks, lawyers, accounting firms, M&A consultants, etc. The only problem: study after study demonstrates this is a strategy fraught with problems of integrating incompatible cultures, and turf battles. But the big aha is that they just don’t create shareholder value, as longitudinal studies by McKinsey and others clearly demonstrate. Again: innovation is the only way to unlock organic growth, and the only way to sustain it is with an innovation strategy that has metrics, is comprehensive, involves the whole enterprise and is cross-functional and cross-silo.

Innovation initiatives require patience, commitment

Innovation will never be an easy sell because it can’t promise a quick payback. It took agribusiness giant Cargill, for example, almost a year of internal debate and study of best practices in innovation before folks there got clear on how they even should define it. With almost 100,000 employees, they knew it was a journey, but that they had to start somewhere if they were going to transform the organization. And as the feisty and outspoken Carol Pletcher, Cargill’s innovation maven, told the audience at Convergence, now they are on their way.

Cargill has the advantage of being a privately-held company. Many CEOs of publicly-traded firms, with Wall Street ever more impatient for steady quarterly earnings, are apt to be gun shy. Innovation conjures up sinkholes of investment and missed earnings – and too soon the ax. So if you’re in an organization that hasn’t yet gotten to yes, you’re going to have to overcome a lot of what professional salespeople call objections, both real and imagined.

Building a winning case for innovation

How can you make a stronger case for innovation? How can you present innovation in a way that gets to yes? By doing your homework. By keeping current on this ever-evolving field and knowing what works and what doesn’t. By constant benchmarking of what other innovation-adept companies are doing, and finding out. And by selling benefits (growth, transformation, talent retention), not features (it works like this, isn’t this clever, etc.).

Most important of all, it’s essential to identify and reference companies that are enjoying the fruits of their systematic approach to innovation. Whirlpool, for instance, added a whopping $100 million in top line revenue during the first 12 months of launching its now-famous innovation initiative. Deloitte-Touche Tomatsu of South Africa doubled the size of its enterprise within two years of launching InnovationZone, its idea capture system. And companies like 3M and Medtronic cite innovation for their success year after year. By building the case for innovation, it won’t be long before other firms come to you, wanting to know how you did it!

Robert B. Tucker is president of The Innovation Resource, and an internationally recognized leader in the field of innovation. Formerly an adjunct professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, Tucker has been a consultant and keynote speaker since 1986. Clients include over 200 of the Fortune 500 companies as well as clients in Europe, the Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Australia. He frequently contributes to publications such as the Journal of Business Strategy, Strategy & Leadership, and Harvard Management Update. He has appeared on PBS, CBS News, and was a featured guest on the CNBC series The Business of Innovation. Learn more about Robert’s latest work, Innovation is Everybody’s Business, at:

New Rules for Financial Industry Preventing Potential Plagiarism to Public in Penned Presentations

There is a lot of talk about plagiarism online and in our schools. Regulators both private and public are cracking down in many industries, especially when it comes to securities and investments or those claiming to be experts and selling their advice via consulting or management fees.

In fact, the latest group of industry professionals to be warned about leading their customers to believe that they wrote something that they did not is Financial Advisors and Stockbrokers. Apparently, many investors are supposedly led to believe that they are experts when in actuality they send out emails, letters and notes using verbiage that was created for them by mutual fund companies, annuity firms or wire houses.

One gentleman, who wished not to be named told me that his brokerage firm sent him this little notation to remind him not to send out anything that was not from him or might lead the client to believe that he wrote it when he did not. Here is what his firm sent him from their compliance department:

We take this opportunity to remind all of our brokers and advisors that you may not present yourself as the author of any communication with the public if you are not in fact the author of the material. Credit must be given to the person or party that created the material. Although some vendors have stated that advisors may insert their name within a communication so that it appears the advisor is the author, FINRA has made it clear that this practice is considered misleading to the public because it attempts to establish expertise or credibility and may violate NASD Rules 2110, 2210 and 2120. No advisor should claim authorship of a communication, including books and newsletters, unless he or she did in fact author the communication.

It is good that the securities industry is holding themselves above the fray and doing the right thing by preventing plagiarism from their brokers and/or advisors. This is clearly a step in the right direction and it is good to see them stepping up to the plate.

Staying in the Present Moment When You Putt is Vital – Anyone Can Become Great at Putting

Most putting problems stem from mental interference with a smooth and natural stoke because of a concern over the result. Golfers can become more mentally focussed on what can go wrong than actually sending the ball straight into the hole which is what they actually want to achieve. Concern over missing a short one or worrying about three putting and getting tense and uptight will cause a poor stroke and quite often give the very result the golfer is trying to avoid.

To putt great you must remove the result and be in the present.

Remove the Result

Ask any top professional in any sport and they will tell you that you must play without concern when you are most concerned. You must play as if the result does not matter when it matters the most. You must focus on going through the process of a shot without thinking about the outcome. No mystery here, the more you worry, the more tense you get and the more negative images you make in your mind, the worse the result will be.

If you really care about the result then you must not care about the result so that you can play naturally, free flowing and with clear focussed thought. Tension from worry not only affects your muscle skills but also clouds judgement and you may not think clearly and end up making a poor decision.

Stay In The Present Moment

If you remain in the present moment then you can have no thoughts about the outcome which is in your future. The outcome has not happened yet and you will also not recall any past bad shots if you are properly focussed in the present. Being in the present you will play naturally and relaxed and there is no doubt your results will get significantly better, Fast!

Easily said this Stay in The Present stuff, but not always so easy to do in reality. In fact the more you attach importance to the shot, the harder it is to “not think” of the result and worry about getting it wrong.

Develop Your Pre Shot Routine

Develop a strong pre-shot routine so that you have a good step by step process to follow and concentrate on for each shot. When you have completed your pre shot routine make sure you pull the trigger quickly. Do not stand over the ball too long as this time has no physical routine to occupy your mind and that is when it can start wandering to unwanted thoughts.

Focus on what you want the ball to do from point A to point B

Use your imagination to get a clear idea of what the ball is going to do and visualise the ball behaviour exactly. Imagine yourself making the perfect stroke to make the ball go exactly into the middle of the hole at the perfect speed. Hear the sound of the ball falling into the hole and rolling around. Go through your setup routine and then have two or three practice putts while looking at the hole and imagining the ball rolling along the perfect path to the hole and disappearing over the edge. Then look back at the ball and pull the trigger within 1 or 2 seconds of refocusing on the ball.

Learning more techniques by The Mental Game of Golf now will give you a superb array of tools which can all be applied to help you as an individual golfer to get into your personal Playing Zone where you play your best golf on a consistent basis.